rcline46 Posted June 11, 2010 Posted June 11, 2010 I was asked to do a proposal for a defined benefit plan for company that has an existing 401(k)/profit sharing/Davis Bacon plan. Now normally this does not present a problem except this is the first Davis Bacon plan I have seen with a contribution rate of about 25% on Davis Bacon wages. When I inspect gross covered pay for the 401(k) plan vs Davis Bacon contribution it comes to 22.5% of pay. Regular profit sharing took the contribution to a full 25%. That leaves very little to use for a defined benefit plan, whether traditional or cash balance. Since the pension plan has to pass 401(a)(26) with meaningful benefit accruals for a sufficient number of participants, a standalone plan seems out of the question as well as a plain DB/DC combo. That leaves me with an offset plan, probably a traditional offset because of the meaningful benefit problems - that is, a formula that gives the desired contribution for the owners and see how the offset affects the rest of the contribution - which is limited due to Davis Bacon contributions. I believe the offset can only be balances accumulated while both plans are in place. Question 1- is is possible to use all prior accumulated balances if past service is granted? Of course this rules out using DB/DC combo testing, but it accomplishes the same goal. Question 2 - is there a better design, and if so are you willing to share it with me? Thanks all.
SoCalActuary Posted June 11, 2010 Posted June 11, 2010 Maybe you can tell me why the new DB plan is not going to have PBGC coverage. What type of employer with Davis Bacon employees will be exempt from PBGC?
Mike Preston Posted June 12, 2010 Posted June 12, 2010 Which is SoCal's way of saying: 404a7 doesn't apply any more, so you should be fine.
rcline46 Posted June 14, 2010 Author Posted June 14, 2010 Me thinks I have been at this too long - overlooked that part! (no 25% limit). Thanks. Now I can focus on keeping the DB cost for the employees in line (limited) considering they are getting a substantial Davis Bacon contribution. I still think a floor/offset is most effective here due to the size of the contribution in the profit sharing plan.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now