Andy the Actuary Posted June 22, 2010 Posted June 22, 2010 Back in the good old days (they were more old than good!), it was common practice to fund a DB plan by purchasing paid-up deferred annuities. Each year, additional annuity contracts would be purchased for increase in accrued benefit. Thus, the Plan was fully insured and except for some final benefits cost, was pretty routine to terminate. So, presuming the Plan/Trust so permits, the Plan can still fund with paid-up annuities. Suppose we have a frozen non-collectively bargained single employer frozen DB plan that is covered by the PBGC. The Plan has not been amended to terminate. An annuity quote is obtained and the Plan is sufficiently funded to purchase nonparticipating annuities with precisely zed dollars remaining. Could this annuity purchase be effected as an investment decision? If so, could the plan then be terminated without the PBGC having conniption fits? Same questions but annuities are purchased only for those in pay status and terminated vesteds? The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
david rigby Posted June 22, 2010 Posted June 22, 2010 I think your scenario is, or should be, permissible. Partially related comment: If the plan states that excess assets are allocated to participants, and if there would be non-zero excess assets under a standard termination, would your proposed scenario cause a fiduciary violation in any way? I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Andy the Actuary Posted June 22, 2010 Author Posted June 22, 2010 I think your scenario is, or should be, permissible.Partially related comment: If the plan states that excess assets are allocated to participants, and if there would be non-zero excess assets under a standard termination, would your proposed scenario cause a fiduciary violation in any way? Couldn't the same be said of any plan that was overfunded prior to 2008? Shouldn't the assets have been moved to money market funds to ensure preservation of principal? The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now