Saiai Posted July 19, 2010 Posted July 19, 2010 Our client is a controlled group of corporations with each controlled group member maintaining its own 401(k) plan. With the expiration of Code Section 410(b) transitional relief for 2009, some of the plans failed the coverage test. We have looked at multiple testing methods. The most viable is applying the average benefits test and converting the allocation rate to a benefits rate through cross testing. However, the contribution required to correct the failure is extremely significant even though it is the least expensive of the alternatives. Has anyone had experience or heard of the IRS, through VCP or otherwise, permitting the correction of a coverage failure by reducing and forfeiting contributions made for the highly compensated rather than making additional contributions for the non-highly compensated or adding eligible participants? Will the IRS consider alternatives to the traditional correction approach in light of financial or business hardship that would result from the traditional correction method? We understand there may be anti cut-back issues with our alternative approach. Please let us know your thoughts or any ideas.
david rigby Posted July 19, 2010 Posted July 19, 2010 Replies in this duplicate post: http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=46115 I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now