Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

We recently received a copy of a restated plan document that incorporated an amendment from 2005. Our (and the client's) intent was to make a specific employee (NHC) eligible for the plan as of 12/1/05.

Normally, we would draft the amendment to indentify the individual specifically. Unfortunately, the draft of the amendment actually reduced eligibility from 1 year to 3 months (401(k) only), and entry dates from semi-annual to monthly (all sources). This did allow the individual to enter the plan as of 12/1/05, but would obviously have impacted all eligibility calculations from then to the present.

Both the company and our firm have continued to operate the plan on the 1 year service and semi-annual entry terms.

1. Can we say this was a mistake in the drafting of the amendment, and this should only have applied to 2005?

2. ??? Suggestions?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use