Guest JM123 Posted August 27, 2010 Report Share Posted August 27, 2010 Is anyone aware of any chart or other materials published that shows the tax treatment under state law? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
My 2 cents Posted August 27, 2010 Report Share Posted August 27, 2010 Isn't the age 26 requirement just for purposes of obtaining health insurance coverage? I don't think it has anything to do with whether or not they qualify as dependents for tax purposes, federal or state. Always check with your actuary first! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JM123 Posted August 27, 2010 Report Share Posted August 27, 2010 Isn't the age 26 requirement just for purposes of obtaining health insurance coverage? I don't think it has anything to do with whether or not they qualify as dependents for tax purposes, federal or state. Income is not imputed to adult children as old as age 26 under federal law. Before, adult children could not qualify as eligilbe dependents, so that inocme was required to be imputed for such coverage. Under the new rules, no imputed income results for the cost of coverage for an employee's adult child as old as age 26. I am looking for a table that shows which states tax rules follow the federal on this, or which might continue to impute income even though it's not imputed for federal tax purposes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david rigby Posted August 27, 2010 Report Share Posted August 27, 2010 Don't know if your inquiry is addressed, but Carol Calhoun includes a variety of information on her website: http://benefitsattorney.com/index.php I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GMK Posted September 7, 2010 Report Share Posted September 7, 2010 For one, Wisconsin does not automatically federalize its tax code, and it has not federalized with respect to coverage to age 26. Maybe they will consider it in January 2011. Adult child coverage, therefore, results in imputed income for state income tax purposes unless the adult child qualifies as a "tax dependent" (as a qualifying child or a qualifying relative). In addition, Wisconsin requires coverage eligibility to age 27, which results in imputed income for both federal and state income taxes. You may need to go to each state's Department of Revenue web site to get your answer. (And then you could post your chart here. Probably not what you had in mind. ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JM123 Posted September 7, 2010 Report Share Posted September 7, 2010 For one, Wisconsin does not automatically federalize its tax code, and it has not federalized with respect to coverage to age 26. Maybe they will consider it in January 2011. Adult child coverage, therefore, results in imputed income for state income tax purposes unless the adult child qualifies as a "tax dependent" (as a qualifying child or a qualifying relative).In addition, Wisconsin requires coverage eligibility to age 27, which results in imputed income for both federal and state income taxes. You may need to go to each state's Department of Revenue web site to get your answer. (And then you could post your chart here. Probably not what you had in mind. ) Thanks for the info re Wisconsin. I agree with that the best approach is to look it up on each State's DOR. Another good source I am finding is the state tax returns and instructions, specifically the adjustments to federal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GMK Posted September 8, 2010 Report Share Posted September 8, 2010 Another good source I am finding is the state tax returns and instructions, specifically the adjustments to federal. Yes, that is the best source if it's up to date. The instructions usually aren't ready until later in the year. DoR web site announcements can give you the information earlier. In addition, nowadays federal and state tax laws sometimes get changed near the end of the year with a retroactive effective date, so the instructions may include a "subject to possible recent changes in the law" warning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GMK Posted September 8, 2010 Report Share Posted September 8, 2010 And here's similar information about Minnesota state taxes: http://benefitslink.com/articles/guests/washbull100823.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MARYMM Posted September 8, 2010 Report Share Posted September 8, 2010 For one, Wisconsin does not automatically federalize its tax code, and it has not federalized with respect to coverage to age 26. Maybe they will consider it in January 2011. Adult child coverage, therefore, results in imputed income for state income tax purposes unless the adult child qualifies as a "tax dependent" (as a qualifying child or a qualifying relative).In addition, Wisconsin requires coverage eligibility to age 27, which results in imputed income for both federal and state income taxes. You may need to go to each state's Department of Revenue web site to get your answer. (And then you could post your chart here. Probably not what you had in mind. ) A chart like this will be a very useful tool, IMO. PA and NJ do not follow Federal tax code for 401(k) and Sec 125 respectively - those are 2 state you might want to look at. Other areas where there will be discrepancies are those states who have different age limits for coverage. IIRC, NY mandates coverage to age 30. (Don't quote me on that - I am rusty. The last time I was reading up on this topic was almost 6 months ago, and I was only concerned about CT. ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MARYMM Posted September 8, 2010 Report Share Posted September 8, 2010 For one, Wisconsin does not automatically federalize its tax code, and it has not federalized with respect to coverage to age 26. Maybe they will consider it in January 2011. Adult child coverage, therefore, results in imputed income for state income tax purposes unless the adult child qualifies as a "tax dependent" (as a qualifying child or a qualifying relative).In addition, Wisconsin requires coverage eligibility to age 27, which results in imputed income for both federal and state income taxes. You may need to go to each state's Department of Revenue web site to get your answer. (And then you could post your chart here. Probably not what you had in mind. ) A chart like this will be a very useful tool, IMO. PA and NJ do not follow Federal tax code for 401(k) and Sec 125 respectively - those are 2 state you might want to look at. Other areas where there will be discrepancies are those states who have different age limits for coverage. IIRC, NY mandates coverage to age 30. (Don't quote me on that - I am rusty. The last time I was reading up on this topic was almost 6 months ago, and I was only concerned about CT. ) edited to add: A google search turned up this chart on the National Conf of State Legislatures website. It lists the maximum age for mandated coverage by state but hasn't been updated since Aug 2009 http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=14497 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GMK Posted September 8, 2010 Report Share Posted September 8, 2010 Thanks for the link to the chart, MARYMM. It's a useful reference (and a good starting point for JM123's chart ). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now