emmetttrudy Posted September 3, 2010 Posted September 3, 2010 Client contributed approx. $50,000 above minimum in 2008 (1st year of plan, BOY val date). But since the funded ratio for 2008 is technically 0% can this prefunding balance not be used to offset the minimum required for 2009?
emmetttrudy Posted September 3, 2010 Author Posted September 3, 2010 Client contributed approx. $50,000 above minimum in 2008 (1st year of plan, BOY val date). But since the funded ratio for 2008 is technically 0% can this prefunding balance not be used to offset the minimum required for 2009? To clarify, I say 0% funded ration for 2008 because at 1/1/2008 assets were $0 so AFTAP = 0%.
david rigby Posted September 3, 2010 Posted September 3, 2010 See IRS Reg. 1.430(f)-1(d)(3)(ii). Read carefully. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
emmetttrudy Posted September 3, 2010 Author Posted September 3, 2010 See IRS Reg. 1.430(f)-1(d)(3)(ii). Read carefully. thanks i dont have access right now but will check it out.
Andy the Actuary Posted September 3, 2010 Posted September 3, 2010 Here's my shot at what it says: If (1) New plan not the result of merger or spinoff and (2) Funding Target for first year was zero, Then, first years funding ratio is deemed to be 80% for purposes of applying PFB in second year. I.e., because funding ratio is indeterminate -- 0 / 0. Thus, if plan grants past service as of plan effective date and FT>0, you won't be able to use PFB in second year (because funding ratio in first year is calculable and is 0%). The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
emmetttrudy Posted September 3, 2010 Author Posted September 3, 2010 thats what i thought. the plan was effective 1/1/2008 but they granbted 1 year of past service so assets = 0 and FT >0 for 2008 valuation. thanks!!!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now