Mister Met Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 This is always confusing to me Say participant has annual annuity (limited by 415b) of $251,000. Participant is age 72. Plan calls for lump sum to be the greater lump sum of PPA interest/mortality and UP84/5% Definition of actuarial equivalence otherwise is UP84/5% Lump sum factor using PPA interest/mortality is 9.80 (effective interest rate is about 4.7%) Lump sum factor using UP84/5% is 7.90 Lump sum factor using 5.5%/PPA mortality is 9.35 Is the lump sum $251,000 x 9.35 = $2,346,000?
Andy the Actuary Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 See post #13 http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?s...aximum&st=0 There is some question (see subsequent posts) whether post #13 step 7 should also include (for small plans) worse of 417(e) as well. In any event, it looks like 7.90 is your man. Also, wouldn't 415 increase be constricted to high 3, which would be less than $251,000? I sense that some large percentage of earth's actuaries (I lead the list) have been confused with how 415(b) applies ever since the '98 IRS "clarification." The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now