Dougsbpc Posted October 18, 2010 Posted October 18, 2010 We inherited a DB plan that has a 100% J&S Normal Form of Benefit for married participants and single life for unmarried. For terminated participants, must we provide the Qualified Optional Survivor Annuity? I would think not since the normal form is 100% J &S.
Andy the Actuary Posted October 18, 2010 Posted October 18, 2010 We inherited a DB plan that has a 100% J&S Normal Form of Benefit for married participants and single life for unmarried.For terminated participants, must we provide the Qualified Optional Survivor Annuity? I would think not since the normal form is 100% J &S. Wouldn't you need to provide a J&75% unless the Plan already provides an optional J&50%? The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
My 2 cents Posted October 19, 2010 Posted October 19, 2010 I think that the QOSA for a plan with a 100% contingent annuitant QJSA is a 50% contingent annuitant form (with spouse as contingent). So the plan has to permit married participants to elect that form. Participants wanting a larger monthly benefit (the 50% form, if the normal form is really a 100% contingent form, would necessarily have to be a larger monthly benefit, with an actuarial adjustment factor somewhere around 107% to 110%) have to be given the opportunity to elect to do so, just as plans with a 50% QJSA have to allow participants to elect a form with a larger survivor benefit. It is my understanding of the spousal consent rules that spousal consent would not be needed to go from a contingent 100% QJSA to a 50% QOSA or from a 50% QJSA to a 75% QOSA, since all such forms meet ERISA's definition of a Qualified Joint and Survivor Annuity (and would thus be exempt from spousal consent requirements). Always check with your actuary first!
Andy the Actuary Posted October 19, 2010 Posted October 19, 2010 It is my understanding of the spousal consent rules that spousal consent would not be needed to go from a contingent 100% QJSA to a 50% QOSA or from a 50% QJSA to a 75% QOSA, since all such forms meet ERISA's definition of a Qualified Joint and Survivor Annuity (and would thus be exempt from spousal consent requirements). (Unless the Plan required) The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now