Brian Haynes Posted October 19, 2010 Posted October 19, 2010 If a Pension Fund accelerates interim withdrawal liability payments under the rationale of the recent Central States v. O'Neill Bros. Transfer & Storage 7th Circuit decision, the full amount of the assessed withdrawal liability amount becomes due. Is the amount due from the employer subject to the 20-year cap? Thanks for any input.
Bill Ecklund Posted October 19, 2010 Posted October 19, 2010 I do not believe it is subject to the 20 year cap, but in my excperience it makes no diffference. Although the present value of the stream of 20 annual payments may be less than the assessed withdrawal liability the sum of the 20 years of payments will far exceed the withdrawal liability.
Peter Gulia Posted October 20, 2010 Posted October 20, 2010 Recently, I advised a client on a situation in which even the simple sum of the 20 years' payments (not adjusted to a present value) is less than half of the assessed withdrawal liability. A plan could argue that a straight reading of the statute means that a missed payment leads to acceleration of the gross withdrawal liability (without the 20 years' limit). I advised my client to make every payment with super-promptness. Peter Gulia PC Fiduciary Guidance Counsel Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 215-732-1552 Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now