retbenser Posted November 19, 2010 Posted November 19, 2010 Sponsor has top-heavy DB + DC combo DC is made up of deferral + safe-harbor match + discretionary profit sharing Safe-harbor match = 3% + 50% of next 2% (max of 4%) Since the combo is TH, all employees must get 5% DC contribution Does this mean that the discretionary profit sharing contribution must make up the difference so that the match + PSP = 5% For example, Participant #1 does not have deferral, and therefore no match. this mean the PSP is 5%? Participant #2 has 6% deferral with 4% match. therefor his PSP is PSP 1%? (In this situation, is it better to remove the match and move to a non-elective 5% PSP contribution for all participants?)
Lou S. Posted November 19, 2010 Posted November 19, 2010 For example, Participant #1 does not have deferral, and therefore no match. this mean the PSP is 5%? Participant #2 has 6% deferral with 4% match. therefor his PSP is PSP 1%? (In this situation, is it better to remove the match and move to a non-elective 5% PSP contribution for all participants?) If your plan offsets T-H for match received, yes on P#1 & P#2. Is it better to switch? Maybe. Depends on turnover and what you are providing. I'd guess that a 3% NE safe-harbor would problably work best with 2% t-h and additional gateway if needed but without seeing demographics and knowing the employer's objectives it's just a guess.
retbenser Posted November 20, 2010 Author Posted November 20, 2010 For example, Participant #1 does not have deferral, and therefore no match. this mean the PSP is 5%? Participant #2 has 6% deferral with 4% match. therefor his PSP is PSP 1%? (In this situation, is it better to remove the match and move to a non-elective 5% PSP contribution for all participants?) If your plan offsets T-H for match received, yes on P#1 & P#2. Is it better to switch? Maybe. Depends on turnover and what you are providing. I'd guess that a 3% NE safe-harbor would problably work best with 2% t-h and additional gateway if needed but without seeing demographics and knowing the employer's objectives it's just a guess. Thanks!
ScottR Posted December 1, 2010 Posted December 1, 2010 Sponsor has top-heavy DB + DC comboDC is made up of deferral + safe-harbor match + discretionary profit sharing Safe-harbor match = 3% + 50% of next 2% (max of 4%) Since the combo is TH, all employees must get 5% DC contribution Does this mean that the discretionary profit sharing contribution must make up the difference so that the match + PSP = 5% For example, Participant #1 does not have deferral, and therefore no match. this mean the PSP is 5%? Participant #2 has 6% deferral with 4% match. therefor his PSP is PSP 1%? (In this situation, is it better to remove the match and move to a non-elective 5% PSP contribution for all participants?) That wouldn't be a very good plan design, IMO. Word will quickly spread to employees that they're going to get 5% of pay, whether or not they defer. IOW, the match is bogus. I think you'd be better off with the flat 3% SH. It could be used for TH purposes, gateway minimums, and rate group testing. Triple duty. .. Scott
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now