Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A small DB plan covers the company owner and 5 employees. Plan assets are invested very aggressively (not our recommendation). In early 2008 the plan had assets of $1.8m and liabilities of $1.4m. As of January 2009 assets of $200k and liabilities of $1.5m. As of today assets of $1.8m and liabilities of just under $1.7m.

The owner has reached NRA and we would like him to be able to take an in-service distribution of his entire benefit. This way he can satisfy his gambling addiction with his benefits and not affect employees.

I believe any reasonable method can be used in valuing benefits for determining whether plan assets will exceed remaining benefits by more than 110%. How about valuing benefits using funding segment rates (yes those same rates that make new DB plan benefits exceed assets by 20%)?

Posted

Have been involved with Plans that have received d-letter where plan has been amended to replace "current liabilities" with "funding target as defined in IRC 430(d)(1)" in the 110% provision and have administered in-service distributions under this provision. This ties the test to the FT used for 430/436 and should not be construed that you can value FT under different assumptions at a determination date other than the actuarial valuation date.

The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use