Andy the Actuary Posted December 28, 2010 Posted December 28, 2010 What discount rate ranges are you seeing? Are you seeing difference between those used for publicly trade companies and those used for privately held industry? The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
david rigby Posted January 4, 2011 Posted January 4, 2011 So far, 5.75% to 6.0%. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
dmb Posted January 12, 2011 Posted January 12, 2011 So far, 5.75% to 6.0%. I just did a discount rate analysis for a non profit organization that pays lump sums and purchases annuities for retirees (does not pay monthly benefits from plan) and came up with 5.1%. Analysis was based on Citigroup 12/31/10 Pension Discount Rate Curve. Rates are very low in the short term.
Andy the Actuary Posted January 12, 2011 Author Posted January 12, 2011 So far, 5.75% to 6.0%. I just did a discount rate analysis for a non profit organization that pays lump sums and purchases annuities for retirees (does not pay monthly benefits from plan) and came up with 5.1%. Analysis was based on Citigroup 12/31/10 Pension Discount Rate Curve. Rates are very low in the short term. Interesting. Now, if the Plan did not pay lump sums, you would use a higher discount rate. But you have determined the rate that liabilities can be effectively settled, so why is it appropriate to use a higher rate? And we open the envelope and find the answer written, "I dunno." The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
david rigby Posted January 12, 2011 Posted January 12, 2011 Analysis was based on Citigroup 12/31/10 Pension Discount Rate Curve. IMHO, judgment call. Remember that the Citigroup curve differs from the IRS curve in two primary respects: - the IRS curve goes to 100 years, while the Citi curve goes to 30 years, - the IRS curve is based on bond rates in the top 3 categories, while the Citi curve is based on bond rates in the top 2 categories (corrections welcome if my summary is not valid.) I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Effen Posted January 12, 2011 Posted January 12, 2011 Also, apparently Citigroup changed their methodology. The new methodology seems to be producing discount rates that are slightly lower than the old methodology. I'm seeing the method changes could result in decreases of 5 - 10 bps. I other words, using the old methodology I might end up with a rate of 5.45% and 5.40% on the new method. I tend to use the Citigroup curve and I'm seeing discount rates close to 5.50% for plans that don't pay lump sums. For plans where the expected payout is a lump sum, I'm getting something around 5.0% or less. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now