Gary Posted January 13, 2011 Posted January 13, 2011 Say a small plan (two or three particiapnts) is terminating 12/31/2010. The reality is that all active participants are going to receive an immediate lump sum equal to PVAB. It seems the valuation should have an imediate decrement and turnover is 100% for that year and the assumed ret age (line 22 of SB) is essentially Not applicable due to plan termination. How are others viewing this? Still using ARA of 62 (NRA in plan) for the SB? Other? thanks
david rigby Posted January 13, 2011 Posted January 13, 2011 Does it matter? I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Gary Posted January 13, 2011 Author Posted January 13, 2011 I believe it does make a difference. For example say the plan act equiv is 5%. With immediate decrement the PVAB is the greater of the lump sum using plan rate (immediately) or funding segment rates. With deferred decrement for say 20 years (age 42 deferred to age 62) then during the deferral period it uses the segment rates (actually 3rd segment rate) and at retirement age the plan rates can kick in. This results in a lower PVAB if 3rd segment rate is greater than 5%. Of course all calcualtions are subject to 415. thanks
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now