Andy the Actuary Posted January 25, 2011 Posted January 25, 2011 An over-funded not-for-profit plan will undergo a spinoff-termination to capture excess plan assets. The sponsor understands that only so much of the assets must be legally transferred to the spunoff plan (for actives). Suppose the sponsor wants to study transferring more than the minimum requirement. Since transferring more than minimum requirement can be construed as benefiting the participants, is it justifiable for the cost of this study to be paid by the plan rather than the plan sponsor? The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
Kevin C Posted January 27, 2011 Posted January 27, 2011 A study to help the sponsor decide how much of the excess to transfer sounds like a settlor activity to me. The expenses to implement their decision sounds like administrative expenses. You probably have already seen this, but the DOL has a good discussion of Settlor vs. Plan Expenses on their website. http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/regs/AOs/settlor_guidance.html
Andy the Actuary Posted January 27, 2011 Author Posted January 27, 2011 Thank you, Mr. C The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now