Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Is it permissible for plan to require 1000 hours for HCEs to accrue a benefit during a plan year, but less than 1,000 hours for the NHCEs?

We're looking at a prospect with high turnover, and 401(a)(26) could easily become an issue. A lower hours requirement would help, but they want to keep the large portion of the plan costs (the HCE accruals) at 1000 hours in case a formula change or a plan freeze is necessary.

Posted

There are no discrimination issues when a Plan offers less favorable terms to an HCE than and NHCE. While it might be preferable to define the class by a characteristic (i.e., senior manager), it should be acceptable to say HCE. Your issue becomes defining HCE for this purpose (such as an employee whose annual pay rate exceeds the 414(q)(1)(B) ($110,000) limit and you also have to deal with when a employee moves from HCE to NHCE and vice-versa; in this respect, the recommendation is once an HCE, always an HCE, including the year the employee became an HCE.

The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.

Posted
Is it permissible for plan to require 1000 hours for HCEs to accrue a benefit during a plan year, but less than 1,000 hours for the NHCEs?

We're looking at a prospect with high turnover, and 401(a)(26) could easily become an issue. A lower hours requirement would help, but they want to keep the large portion of the plan costs (the HCE accruals) at 1000 hours in case a formula change or a plan freeze is necessary.

My two cents:

My first concern was whether it was a BRF issue but it is not. "Benefits" for purposes of the availability tests does not encompass the allocation or benefit formulas under which the participants accrue benefits under a plan or the requirement to receive such contribution/benefit. Those allocations or benefits do not have to be available on a nondiscriminatory basis, but the allocations or accruals must satisfy the nondiscrimination test.

My guess would be to make sure it satisfied 410(b) rate group test - don't see a problem with that either since you're favoring NHCEs. I would also make sure your document could provide for a different allocation requirement for different classes of employees. May require entire restatement if the document doesn't support that option on its pre-approved format.

"Great thoughts reduced to practice become great acts." William Hazlitt

CPC, QPA, QKA, ERPA, APA

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use