Andy the Actuary Posted April 14, 2011 Posted April 14, 2011 A well-funded frozen DB plan sponsored by a not-for-profit organization has a $4 million pre-paid pension asset (say it's all in "Liability For Pension Benefits"). The sponsor wants to terminate the Plan but does not want to run $4 million through expense in a single year. Has anyone been involved with similar situations were the auditor has sanctioned (i.e., not written an unfavorable opinion) that the sponsor could expense this pre-paid over a number of years and then terminate the Plan when it has been written off? The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
AndyH Posted April 14, 2011 Posted April 14, 2011 A well-funded frozen DB plan sponsored by a not-for-profit organization has a $4 million pre-paid pension asset (say it's all in "Liability For Pension Benefits"). The sponsor wants to terminate the Plan but does not want to run $4 million through expense in a single year.Has anyone been involved with similar situations were the auditor has sanctioned (i.e., not written an unfavorable opinion) that the sponsor could expense this pre-paid over a number of years and then terminate the Plan when it has been written off? Is there a large unrecognized loss? If so, wouldn't a shorter amortization period for losses accomplish the objective, or removal of the 10% corridor if used? We've had those changes approved by one of the large audit firms.
Andy the Actuary Posted April 14, 2011 Author Posted April 14, 2011 A well-funded frozen DB plan sponsored by a not-for-profit organization has a $4 million pre-paid pension asset (say it's all in "Liability For Pension Benefits"). The sponsor wants to terminate the Plan but does not want to run $4 million through expense in a single year.Has anyone been involved with similar situations were the auditor has sanctioned (i.e., not written an unfavorable opinion) that the sponsor could expense this pre-paid over a number of years and then terminate the Plan when it has been written off? Is there a large unrecognized loss? If so, wouldn't a shorter amortization period for losses accomplish the objective, or removal of the 10% corridor if used? We've had those changes approved by one of the large audit firms. Nope, its about 800K AOCI and 3,200K Liability for pension benefits. But, you've given me an idea. Thank you. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now