Guest GWilliams Posted August 4, 2011 Posted August 4, 2011 If an employer "refuses" to pay the excise taxes for a funding deficiency, can the owners/officers be held personally liable for them?
david rigby Posted August 4, 2011 Posted August 4, 2011 It depends. IRC 4971(e) defines the liability for the tax. 4971(e) Liability for Tax.—4971(e)(1) In general.— Except as provided in paragraph (2), the tax imposed by subsection (a), (b), or (f) shall be paid by the employer responsible for contributing to or under the plan the amount described in section 412(a)(2). (Code Sec. 4971(e)(2), below, was amended by P.L. 109-280. For sunset provision, see P.L. 109-280, §221©.) _ 4971(e)(2) Joint and several liability where employer member of controlled group.— 4971(e)(2)(A) In general.— If an employer referred to in paragraph (1) is a member of a controlled group, each member of such group shall be jointly and severally liable for the tax imposed by subsection (a), (b), (f), or (g). 4971(e)(2)(B) Controlled group.— For purposes of subparagraph (A), the term “controlled group” means any group treated as a single employer under subsection (b), ©, (m), or (o) of section 414. Probably the employer will answer your question after consultation with tax and/or ERISA counsel. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now