Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Does anyone have any practical experience in understanding the definition of Predecessor Employer in Regs. Section 1.415(f)-1©(2). I am particularly concerned/puzzled by the phrase “a continuation of all or a portion of the trade or business of the former entity”.

Two doctors operate a partnership which maintains a defined benefit plan. The doctors split and Doctor A assumes the sponsorship of the DB Plan. The employees who leave with Doctor B are paid their benefits under the DB Plan, except for Doctor B. Doctor B is apparently not paid because the plan is under-funded. His benefit is still held in the old DB Plan currently sponsored by Doctor A. Doctor B now wants to establish a cash balance plan for his business. Is the partnership considered a Predecessor Employer and, as a result, must Doctor B’s benefit under the old DB Plan be aggregated with his benefit under the cash balance plan in determining his Section 415 limitations?

Any thoughts with citations or references would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

"Great thoughts reduced to practice become great acts." William Hazlitt

CPC, QPA, QKA, ERPA, APA

Posted

You will want to see if 415(h) applies.

The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.

Posted
You will want to see if 415(h) applies.

Thanks, Andy. I appreciate the guidance. I'm going to look into that now.

"Great thoughts reduced to practice become great acts." William Hazlitt

CPC, QPA, QKA, ERPA, APA

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use