Doghouse Posted November 2, 2011 Posted November 2, 2011 Company has DB Plan and DC Plan, general tested in aggregate. DB plan covers only 2 owners. DC plan covers 4 NHCE staff. DB plan has 2 year wait/100% and DC plan has 1 year wait/6 yr graded vesting. I think we may have a benefits, rights & features concern with respect to eligibility and/or vesting. Does anyone agree with me? On eligibility, vesting, or both? Dog
Lou S. Posted November 2, 2011 Posted November 2, 2011 I don't have an answer to your specific question, but don't you have a 401(a)(26) problem with only 2 of 6 in the DB plan?
Doghouse Posted November 2, 2011 Author Posted November 2, 2011 I don't have an answer to your specific question, but don't you have a 401(a)(26) problem with only 2 of 6 in the DB plan? That's because I made a typo - it's 2 in the DB and 3 in the DC.
John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA Posted November 3, 2011 Posted November 3, 2011 The IRS has said that a 3-year cliff and a 6-year graded vesting schedule are identical for testing purposes, but yours has immediate vesting. This would appear to be subject to BRF testing. Just curious, has the IRS ever made a case of that? The plans are aggregated for coverage, so the differing eligibility requirement does not appear to be a benefit right or feature to me. Oh, by the way, you may want to read this link: http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=49421
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now