rcline46 Posted December 28, 2011 Posted December 28, 2011 Somehow I got myself totally confused, so what else is new? Terminating DB plan covered by PBGC. Act Equiv is set to GUST, fully amended to PPA/EGTRRA. IRS says to use its rates for PVAB and lump sum distributions. PBGC says use its rates for lump sum distributions. Which rates do I use for distributions from on-going plans? Which rates do I use for distributions from terminating plans? Why can't they get their acts together and use one set of rates for PBGC premiums, funding and distributions? Never mind answering this one, "Its the government, stupid!".
Andy the Actuary Posted December 28, 2011 Posted December 28, 2011 The Plan document governs how to determine lump sums whether or not the Plan has terminated. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
SoCalActuary Posted December 28, 2011 Posted December 28, 2011 If you are terminating an underfunded plan that will be taken over by PBGC, then you have a problem. If not, just follow the plan documents and pay out on the IRS 417(e) rules. If the PBGC is going to trustee the plan, then they will have jurisdiction. If you disagree, you may go through their appeals process.
rcline46 Posted December 28, 2011 Author Posted December 28, 2011 Thanks all. I THOUGHT the 417(e) rules ruled, but reading the PBGC notices, they SEEM to read you must use their rates to pay on standard terminations. I think all regulations, announcements, and so forth should be writter at a 12th grade level, and clearly. Oh well.
david rigby Posted December 28, 2011 Posted December 28, 2011 Some chronology might help: 417(e) was subtantially amended by TRA86. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now