Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Standalone non-TH cross-tested PSP requires 1000 hrs and last day for allocation purposes. Ratio percent is at 60%. Can the plan test for coverage under ABT or will they fail the reasonable classification test because 1000 hrs and last day are not objective business criteria?

Thanks for any insight!

PensionPro, CPC, TGPC

Posted

I think the IRS would like us to believe (and may have actually said it in conferences) that 1000 hours and last day are not a "reasonable classification". However, I think everyone uses the 1000 hours and last day as a "reasonable classification" and therefore uses the ABPT for coverage. I don't think anyone actually follows this IRS "belief". I don't think I've heard of this being challenged by the IRS either.

Posted

ERISAToolkit, what in heavens name are you talking about?

Posted
The non-discriminatory classification test.

The classification must be BOTH reasonable and non-discriminatory. It is non-discriminatory, but is it reasonable? CHC93 addresses the issue raised. Our firm is very conservative and will not cross paths with IRS informal pronouncements. Curious if there are any other perspectives or if the IRS has changed its views any.

PensionPro, CPC, TGPC

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use