Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

We have a PS plan. A person terminated was paid out fully a few years ago and was forf. They have been rehired and everyone agrees he could repay his distribution and get the amounts forf back when he was paid out restored.

We use the Relius document.

As I read the base document it looks like the restore should be funded in this order:

1) current forf

2) current plan earnings (this is a pooled asset plan)

3) current contributions

Can you really use the earnings from a pooled plan? There aren't enough current forf. I always thought the employer just had to kick in more money to the plan if the current forf were not large enough. I am having a hard time wrapping my mind around the idea I can take earnings from the other people which is going to include people who did not benefit fromt he orginal forf.

Posted

Use of earnings form the pooled assets distorts investment return allocation. Despite some earlier IRS authority to the contrary, some roviewers are currently taking a very strict approach about allocations. We never new how much distortion was permissible under the existing authority. I personally don't like the plan provision. It would never be any any of my plans. I doubt that anyone would get in trouble for disregarding it, esspecially if the ifduciary determines that it is contratry to ERISA or jeopardizes qualification.

Posted

Thanks Tom learned something new today.

I don't know if I have ever seen a case where the doc allowed it or the current year's forf weren't large enough. But in this case both appeared to happen.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use