AKconsult Posted April 27, 2012 Posted April 27, 2012 Question: A doctor who is a partner in an anesthesiology practice has supposedly terminated and is now an independent contractor. We are being told he is paid on a 1099 and is no longer a W-2 employee. But he is still an owner of the practice. He wants to take a distribution from the plan. I'm not sure where to go with this. This doctor is also a trustee. As a TPA firm, how much should we really question this?
WDIK Posted April 27, 2012 Posted April 27, 2012 As a TPA firm, how much should we really question this? The level to which a TPA questions a client's actions is inversely proportional to the level of responsibility a TPA wants to take when the client's actions go awry. ...but then again, What Do I Know?
QDROphile Posted April 27, 2012 Posted April 27, 2012 A lawyers's answer: Not at all. But that answer comes from a premise that a TPA should not be answering any legal or interpretive questions and that premise is never respected. Next question: What services did you contract for and what expectations did you create on the part of the plan administrator?
mbozek Posted April 28, 2012 Posted April 28, 2012 Question: A doctor who is a partner in an anesthesiology practice has supposedly terminated and is now an independent contractor. We are being told he is paid on a 1099 and is no longer a W-2 employee. But he is still an owner of the practice. He wants to take a distribution from the plan. I'm not sure where to go with this. This doctor is also a trustee. As a TPA firm, how much should we really question this? What does your TPA agreement provide as to how you discharge your responsibilities? It should state that the TPA firm is not a fiduciary of the plan and that you will rely on the instructions of the plan fiduciary in carryng out your responsibilities which are presumed to be in accordance with applicalbe laws. mjb
PensionPro Posted May 2, 2012 Posted May 2, 2012 Question: A doctor who is a partner in an anesthesiology practice has supposedly terminated and is now an independent contractor. We are being told he is paid on a 1099 and is no longer a W-2 employee. But he is still an owner of the practice. He wants to take a distribution from the plan. I'm not sure where to go with this. This doctor is also a trustee. As a TPA firm, how much should we really question this? You will need to know whether the sole prop and the group practice are related employers before you can process the distribution. PensionPro, CPC, TGPC
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now