HarleyBabe Posted April 30, 2012 Posted April 30, 2012 Was given a last minute document to do and racing a little. I haven't had to prepare the docs before and have a question about the NRA. Their current doc had a retirement age of 58 and 10 on part but no later than 65 and 5 on part. Question is, how do I accomodate that first piece. I don't believe that is allowable any longer is it?
Andy the Actuary Posted April 30, 2012 Posted April 30, 2012 58/10 is still allowable so long as you can support it reasonably representing the norm for the plan sponsor's industry. How to demonstrate this? Generally, good luck. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
HarleyBabe Posted April 30, 2012 Author Posted April 30, 2012 problem is, I"m coding the doc and 58 and 10 isn't an option. It warns me that it shouldn't be less than 62. Using an FT william Doc, How would I code the doc. I can add a custom sectio nthat won't throw it off their prototype. They, meaning FT Williams support, suggest putting an early retiement in.
John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA Posted April 30, 2012 Posted April 30, 2012 Could you put in a fully subsidized early retirement benefit payable at 58 and 10? and change the NRA to 65/5? Will that fit the prototype? Will the actuary be satisfied with that solution?
Andy the Actuary Posted April 30, 2012 Posted April 30, 2012 Will the actuary be satisfied with that solution? Including this actuary's spouse, no one has ever voiced concern over an actuary's satisfaction. If it fits the prototype, you could have NRA = 65 (or even 62) as a safe-harbor and then have unreduced e.r. at 58/10. This stuff was covered in IRS Notices 2007-8 and 2007-69. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA Posted April 30, 2012 Posted April 30, 2012 Including this actuary's spouse, no one has ever voiced concern over an actuary's satisfaction. Funny. When an issue comes up, e.g. the Final NRA Regs interim amendment, the Final 436 Regs interim amendment, or even some individual plan amendmens, we prefer to discuss the issue with the actuary before writing the amendment. Other amendments, such as a plan freeze amendment, would certainly not need such discussion, although the actuary would have already been involved with answwering any impact questions re: funding, effect on financials, etc. If the amendment increases benefits, confirmation of the funded status takes place (if not already determined). FWIW.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now