Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Small traditional Defined Benefit plan will terminate in about 4 months.

The plan document contains an alternate form of benefit choice of "Single sum distribution of a portion of the vested accrued benefit". This is not further described in the document.

This seems to indicate the plan could offer an alternate form of benefit that would allow a distribution of a portion of a benefit paid in the form of a lump sum and the remaining portion paid in the form of an annuity.

We have never had a plan sponsor want to offer this.

Is this possible?

Thanks.

Posted

Your document allows it. Why not?

I had some of these way back in 1985, when someone took 30% as J&S, 30% as 10 CC, and 40% as lump sum.

Posted

What a mess.

I agree with SoCal, but caution you to look for other docuemtnatino (precedent, administrative interpretation) that might help decide whether "portion" has any reasonable limitations on its definition.

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Posted

The Corbell DB VS document allows for installments. What a nightmare but it's there. On the DB VS document, they recieved and opinion letter which I would assume means it's allowed.

IMHO

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use