Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Pardon my ignorance, as I'm not a DB person. I'm trying find if there is a relatively straight answer (hah!) to this:

For plan terminations, one would normally use 417 rates, yes? If so, under MAP-21, must you still use 417 rates, or are you allowed to use the "annuity substitution" rates, and therefore possibly reduce the lump-sum payout? I'm under the impression that it is the former rather than the latter.

Thanks!

P.S. - as I look over my question, I think perhaps there is a defference for plan terminations and for normal plan FUNDING. So, for example, when calculating funding for lump sums for a non-terminating plan, you can use annuity substitution rates, even though the lump sum benefit itself does not change? Maybe I'm just confusing the issue more...

Posted

Yes, funding and plan termination are different. The MAP21 rates apply only to funding issues, and have no effect on 417e lump sum values.

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use