Dougsbpc Posted October 22, 2012 Posted October 22, 2012 Suppose you have a plan that was not frozen. Instead, the plan was amended to reduce the benefit formula a few years ago. As a consequence, most full time participants have not accrued additional benefits over and above their grandfathered accrued benefits for the past two years. All will next year as the new benefit will exceed grandfathered benefits. I would think participants would be entitled to a 415 dollar limit increase for the two years when they did not have an increase in their accrued benefit. This because they would have met all the requirements to accrue a benefit for those years. Anyone agree / disagree? Thanks
Andy the Actuary Posted October 22, 2012 Posted October 22, 2012 What does the plan language provide? The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now