Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

these proposed regulations indicate that a DB plan may not, directly or indirectly, b/c of attainment of age, disregard compensation after attainment of such age.

Thoughts?? It is still in Corbel's DB checklist.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I'm looking at Corbel's DB checklist and I don't see an age exclusion.

Are you interpreting the "highest X years in the last ten, excluding the five years preceding NRD" as an age exclusion? I don't see this as such because NRD, depending on how it is defined, could be a single age or a range of ages (e.g. later of 65 or 5th anniversary of participation).

Since a DB is designed to pay benefits at NRD, if a reference to NRD is deemed to be an indirect reference to age, almost every provision in the plan could be deemed to be indirectly contingent upon age.

All the salary averaging definitions on the checklist are commonly used and to my knowledge have not been challenged as being indirect references to age and therefore impermissible under this regulation.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use