Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

How does one determine if a discount rate used by the actuary is reasonable? Is there a reference source for acceptable discount rates? Thanks for any feedback you can provide.

Posted
How does one determine if a discount rate used by the actuary is reasonable? Is there a reference source for acceptable discount rates? Thanks for any feedback you can provide.

To answer your question, please disclose:

1. Accounting or funding or lump sum determination or other purpose (top heavy or 401(a)(4) testing?

2. If funding, is Plan subject to minimum funding standards?

3. State the assumptions

There are general guidelines for accounting but no stipulated rates. Federal law prescribes the rates used for funding for plans subject to minimum funding standards. If the Plan is a private plan (as opposed, e.g., to governmental), lump sum sums are determined by the Plan subject to minimum standards.

The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.

Posted

I'll assume you refer to the FAS87/106/158 discount rate. (OK, it's now ASC 715.)

A few thoughts, that you can use or ignore:

1. Note that the actuary uses the discount rate, but does not choose it. The party responsible for the discount rate is the plan sponsor who must put FAS87/106/158 disclosure items in its financial statement. For this reason, many sponsors have their auditor review (but not choose) the discount rate. Most of the auditors I deal with prefer to review the process of choosing a rate, rather than the rate itself.

2. I recommend a particular process to my clients, some of whom use it.

3. Some people think that "reasonableness" is measured by "what is everyone else doing". I'm strongly opposed to that as a definition.

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use