Spencer Posted December 17, 2012 Posted December 17, 2012 I work with DC plans so I need advice on whether a DB plan could be an option for client. Owner with $700,000+ in comp for 2012. Age 57 and it is a sole prop. Only other employee is his son, age 32. Owner wants to put away as much as possible. Concerns are that compensation may be not be anywhere near this in years to come. Would he be locked in contributions for several years? how long would IRS expect him to keep plan? Any thoughts? Thanks!
Andy the Actuary Posted December 17, 2012 Posted December 17, 2012 Recommend your client engage a pension actuary (at a fee) to assist with the analysis. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
david rigby Posted December 17, 2012 Posted December 17, 2012 In addition to Andy's advice, the answer to your title question is (probably) YES. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
SoCalActuary Posted December 17, 2012 Posted December 17, 2012 I work with DC plans so I need advice on whether a DB plan could be an option for client. Owner with $700,000+ in comp for 2012. Age 57 and it is a sole prop. Only other employee is his son, age 32. Owner wants to put away as much as possible. Concerns are that compensation may be not be anywhere near this in years to come. Would he be locked in contributions for several years? how long would IRS expect him to keep plan? Any thoughts? Thanks! Good to see that you are considering your client's best interest here, and not simply using the tools you already have. "To a hammer, every problem is a nail." This fact pattern can result in pension contributions up to 4 times the level of the DC plan limit, if the fact pattern is favorable. But my fellow actuaries will tell you to get competent advice and refer it to the right person.
Mark Whitelaw Posted December 18, 2012 Posted December 18, 2012 Is his need a current tax deduction or a tax-free future value? Is he and / or his son healthy? If future value, healthy HCE Class individuals have been able to access greater lifelong value since 2002 outside a tax-qualified benefit plan on a direct, participant defined contribution capacity basis. Think of it as an uncapped Roth complement third-party sponsored and administered plan for healthy HCE Class individuals with access to institutional asset pricing you can't get in a tax qualified plan or retail personal financial planning.
Mr. T Posted December 18, 2012 Posted December 18, 2012 What you talk'n 'bout fool! Dat sounds like an insurance salesman talk and Hannibal know I don't like no insurance salemen.
Spencer Posted December 18, 2012 Author Posted December 18, 2012 Is his need a current tax deduction or a tax-free future value? current tax deduction. Thanks for all the input. Does the DB plan have to be in place/signed prior to year end for 2012?
Andy the Actuary Posted December 18, 2012 Posted December 18, 2012 Once again, you need a professional because you are talking about plan and trust. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
SoCalActuary Posted December 18, 2012 Posted December 18, 2012 Is his need a current tax deduction or a tax-free future value? current tax deduction. Thanks for all the input. Does the DB plan have to be in place/signed prior to year end for 2012? Only if benefits of the plan are going to be used. No plan - no deduction for 2012.
Mark Whitelaw Posted December 18, 2012 Posted December 18, 2012 I agree with you Mr. T. ... and No. Retail "insurance" and HCE Class access to institutional IRC 7702 based investing are apples and shampoo different products and markets.
Mr. T Posted December 18, 2012 Posted December 18, 2012 You agree wit me? I don't even know what you talk'n bout... Retail "insurance" and HCE Class access to institutional IRC 7702 based investing are apples and shampoo different products and markets If future value, healthy HCE Class individuals have been able to access greater lifelong value since 2002 outside a tax-qualified benefit plan on a direct, participant defined contribution capacity basis an uncapped Roth complement third-party sponsored and administered plan for healthy HCE Class individuals with access to institutional asset pricing you can't get in a tax qualified plan or retail personal financial planning. What does this all this gibber jabber mean?
Andy the Actuary Posted December 18, 2012 Posted December 18, 2012 I think I can sum up all of the comments: You can't practice billiards on a ping-pong table and hope to become competent at Scrabble. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
ESOP Guy Posted December 18, 2012 Posted December 18, 2012 I think I can sum up all of the comments: You can't practice billiards on a ping-pong table and hope to become competent at Scrabble. Where is that "like" button again!
frizzyguy Posted December 20, 2012 Posted December 20, 2012 I think I can sum up all of the comments: You can't practice billiards on a ping-pong table and hope to become competent at Scrabble. Where is that "like" button again! I do like this one a lot but my favorite comment on this board is definitely "To a hammer, every problem is a nail". IMHO
Andy the Actuary Posted December 20, 2012 Posted December 20, 2012 Is is amusing to learn from IMDB.com and other sources that Mr. T (Lawrence Tureaud) stands but 5'10" which is a wee shorter than this imposing persona suggests. Perhaps he was misnamed and should have been called "Mr. t" ? The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now