Draper55 Posted January 29, 2013 Posted January 29, 2013 feel like this is a dead horse but it periodically rears its ugly head with my clients...client wants to tap retirement plans(db and dc with h&w only participants) for purchase of second home without incurring distribution taxes. although i have had clients own real estate in plans it has never been in personal use real estate. so in a nutshell, i am of the opinion that even if the plan invests in a business or businesses that subsequently have ownership in a property which is for the personal use of a disqualified person then it would still be a prohibited transaction because it indirectly benefits the disqualified person.
Draper55 Posted February 1, 2013 Author Posted February 1, 2013 after much consternation, the h&w client who had decided to do two 50k loans in the db and dc plans plus take a big post 62 in svc db distribution, abruptly changed their minds and agreed that renting a warm weather second home for $10k a month for 2-3 mos per year was preferabe to tapping the q plans with all the tax issues...i good decision i think.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now