Gary Posted August 16, 1999 Posted August 16, 1999 My understanding is that current regs provide that if a plan does not provide notice of suspension of benefits, then they must provide for the greater of the actual accrued benefit at late ret. or the act. equiv. of such ben. Any other thoughts?
david rigby Posted August 16, 1999 Posted August 16, 1999 My understanding is that, if the plan provides the greater of (1) additional accruals, or (2) the actuarial equivalent of the NRD benefit, then the plan is exempt from the DOL requirement to notify participants of the "suspension" or "forfeiture" of benefits. Hmm, I wonder what would happen to Social Security if the federal govenrment were required to follow its own rules. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now