Mister Met Posted June 24, 2013 Posted June 24, 2013 Plan doc wording says that for a ppt who meets the service but not age requirement for an ER benefit, he may receive an ER benefit based on a table of ER factors in the doc that starts at age 50 once the age requirement is met. The ppt in question would be eligible at age 49 based on the wording in the doc. Does the fact that the referenced table starts at age 50 trump the apparent eligibility at age 49? Or would we extrapolate (I guess) back to age 49? Thanks
Andy the Actuary Posted June 24, 2013 Posted June 24, 2013 The table is a matter of convenience and communication. Use the actuarial basis on which it is was determined to compute the age 49 factor. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
david rigby Posted June 24, 2013 Posted June 24, 2013 ...meets the service but not age requirement for an ER benefit...once the age requirement is met. Is age 50 the plan-defined minimum age requirement? If so, extrapolation to an earlier age is not appropriate. If not, then Andy's advice is the best approach. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Mister Met Posted June 24, 2013 Author Posted June 24, 2013 The relevant eligibility criterion is attainment of 73 points, but no age requirement is attached to this.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now