Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So in 403b plan documents, why do we have to enter a "normal retirement age" between 62-65? Employees can take plan assets at 59.5

So it is somewhat of a meaningless requirement, no? Does it have any significance?

Posted

one possibility:

if there are employer contributions (e.g. match) and they are subject to vesting, it would make a difference since 100% vesting kicks in at normal retirement.

Posted

one possibility:

if there are employer contributions (e.g. match) and they are subject to vesting, it would make a difference since 100% vesting kicks in at normal retirement.

Ahhh, thank you. But without employer contributions, it seems to be meaningless, right?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use