Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest BenefitsAnnie
Posted

I've read the rule (thanks for the link!) and I don't see the "exceptions and restrictions" to which you refer. In fact, it seems like a no-brainer to me in terms of having no downside to the employer or the employee other than the existing downside to the employer of having an employee leave prior to paying in the full amount of his or her FSA election. Am I missing something? Is there a downside?

Posted

can't speak for Mr. Presson, but I found this

http://news.leavitt.com/health-care-reform/irs-changes-use-lose-rule-allow-500-annual-carryover-health-fsas/

which says that "plans that currently have a grace period for the 2013 plan year (allowing reimbursement in 2014) might not be able to implement the carryover provision until the 2015 plan year."

"a plan that currently includes a grace period, but wants to switch to allowing a carryover instead, must be amended to eliminate the grace period by the end of 2013."

but this "may be subject to non-Code legal constraints.” I'm guessing that these non-Code constraints are problematic.

Posted

The biggest issue for our plans is the grace period exception. So now we're having to spend a lot of time explaining to participants why we really don't recommend doing this for 2013; too many participants might have planned for the grace period to use the rest of their money.

Then we'll have to decide what to do for 2014.

Also hearing about a potential legal challenge that the IRS has unilaterally created deferred compensation where they weren't allowed.

For anyone making this change for 2013, how are the software changes getting done?

William C. Presson, ERPA, QPA, QKA
bill.presson@gmail.com
C 205.994.4070

 

Posted

Also hearing about a potential legal challenge that the IRS has unilaterally created deferred compensation where they weren't allowed.

I'd like to hear more about this legal challenge, if you or anyone else has some info.

Posted

Situation: Current Plan Sponsor does not allow expenses after 12/31. Not interested in new $500 carryover law, but with this new ruling, will now consider extended spending period (instead of $500 carryover) effective only with 2014 plan year because of perceived extra admin with $500 carryover rule, especially applying it to 2013. I'm not seeing what the extra admin is for current or future years.

Posted
For anyone making this change for 2013, how are the software changes getting done?

Depends on the software. We already had a CarryOver amount field available when entering elections so we just activate it for this particular benefit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use