Draper55 Posted January 21, 2014 Posted January 21, 2014 Participant turned 70.5 in 2012 and commenced rmd on 4/1 /2013 for 100%j&s amount with cola increasing at 4.75% as annual annuity(not monthly). Need.to make adjustment for 2013 accrual. Benefit at 12/31/2012 was AE of NRA amount(formula late accruals are much smaller). At 12/31/2013 i compute plan benefit as AE of NRA benefit. Next subtract similar amount as of 12/31/2012. Then compute 12/31/2013 AE annuity of benefit paid during 2013(since no risk of forfeiture accumulate payment with interest only before annuitizing). Subtract this piece to get my life annuity additional accrual. Turn this into 100% j&s annuity and add to 1st year payment increased at 4.75% to get my year two annual payment amount. Does this sound correct?
My 2 cents Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 If the plan is a defined benefit plan, wouldn't continued payments of non-decreasing periodic benefits payable for at least the life of the participant (increased, as appropriate, for plan cost of living benefits) automatically be considered sufficient to meet the MRD requirements (especially if there are no new accruals to go into effect)? The MRD regulations specify, for defined benefit plans, that paying ongoing lifetime benefits of that sort do meet the regulations. If it is a defined benefit plan, I think you would just continue paying the established 100% J&S benefit (plus applicable changes due to the plan's COLA) without having to perform more than perfunctory calculations (to verify that additional accruals would not affect the amounts payable). Remember, actuarial increases for deferred retirement beyond NRA do not result in additional accruals. Hard-frozen plans (frozen before 9/1/05) that are exempt from IRC Section 436 can certainly recognize deferral beyond NRA through actuarially increased benefits without losing their status. Always check with your actuary first!
Draper55 Posted January 23, 2014 Author Posted January 23, 2014 this is a 5% owner still working..so i guess my thought is that i calculate additional accruals as if 401(a)(9) did not exist and then adjust this accrual down for the AE of the payments made. I then add this net accrual to the existing rmd stream. just wanted to make sure i am not way off in my approach.
david rigby Posted January 23, 2014 Posted January 23, 2014 Yes, you calculate additional accruals (but that is not related to the ownership status), using the plan provisions. Also you calculate the AE of NRB, using plan provisions. Be careful, since not all plans use the same method. It's possible that the net additional accrual is zero. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now