Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A 50% owner of a company earned a benefit under the company's DB plan. Now she has started her own company of which she is the 100% owner and she would like to start a new DB plan.

My reading of IRC Section 415(g) is that her benefits from both plans must be aggregated for 415 purposes. Is this correct? Thanks! :)

Posted

Agree. IRC Sec. 415(h). This is to prevent setting up lots of little companies to flout the 415 restrictions.

The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.

Posted

So long as 50% means exactly 50%, 415(h) should not apply.

The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.

Posted

Did the rules change that extended the 415 restrictions to "brother-sister" type arrangements? I'm reading that it applies only to parent-sub groups (greater than 50%). The OP example appears to be brother-sister, but the threshold is not enough either way.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use