Doghouse Posted July 21, 2014 Posted July 21, 2014 We (TPA) have taken over a DB plan for 2013. It turns out that the 2012 contribution was funded late, and the 2012 Schedule SB reflects a funding deficiency. However, the sponsor never paid the excise tax. They are now asking whether there is any particular advantage to coming forward and paying the tax at this time, vs. waiting until the IRS asks about it. Can anyone think of anything? Keep in mind that the funding deficiency goes away in 2013. Dog
david rigby Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 Paying late usually leads to interest and/or penalties. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Effen Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 Deficiencies are not an "audit game" kind of thing. Since the SB was filed showing the deficiency, the IRS WILL send a letter asking followup questions. They generally don't ignore this kind of thing. Prepare the 5330 for them, tell them to file it and pay the excise tax. If they choose not to, at least it won't be your problem. Also, is this plan covered by the PBGC? If so, you also have a late reportable event with the PBGC to deal with as well. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now