Jump to content

UP-1984 Table


Recommended Posts

Guest SPollock
Posted

Can someone help me find a UP-1984 Present Value Factor Table at 8 1/2 interest. I have searched the Web but can't find one. Also, what does the UP stand for? Thank you for the help!

------------------

Posted

UP stands for Unisex Pensioners (I believe)

If all you want are the % (e.g. age 65 = 95.3789) I can fax those to you.

Guest SPollock
Posted

TOM,

I would greatly appreciate it if you could fax me the percentages. My fax # is 219-922-2409. Thank you!!

------------------

Posted

Piggybacking on the earlier postings, is there a Web site or other reference material that shows all of the common mortality tables?

Posted

The Society of Actuaries website (soa.org) has a library of tables. Not sure if the UP84 table is there. That table was originally published by the Conference of Consulting Actuaries (ccactuaries.org) in May 1975.

[This message has been edited by pax (edited 10-25-1999).]

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

TOM

Would you be willing to fax me the percentages as well? My fax number is 248-538-0629. Thanks!!

Guest TMathis
Posted

Tom: We would also really appreciate a copy of the portion of the UP-1984 table showing 8 1/2%. Our fax number is (810) 342-7053. Thanks.

Posted

By the way, I've started doing Age Weighted Profit-Sharing Plans (welcome to the party). The Annuity Purchase Rate seems totally irrelevant. The formula says to calculate a benefit of 1% of pay at NRA, divide by the APR to find a lump sum, then discount this back to present value.

Mathematically, it doesn't matter if you divide by 1, 10 or 100, or if you made it 1, 10 or 100% of pay.

Just my two cents.

Posted

generally it is true that the mortality table chosen doesn't make a difference. if all participants have the same retirement age then it is a constant. however, if an ee is past normal retirement, or retirement age is 65/5 then it may make a difference.

The mortality table used in cross testing (not age weighted) will make a slight difference if it becomes necessary to group accrual rates

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use