elmobob14 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 Employer offers coverage to everyone regardless of hours worked. If you work 20hr/week, you get coverage. If you work 40hrs/week, you get coverage. Because of this, the employer isn't applying a measurement period. But is a measurement period and a stability period applying in the background? So, if an employee works in year one and goes on leave of absence in year two, is the employee entitled to an offer of coverage throughout the entire period of absence because an imputed stability period requires it? Is there a measurement period/stability period operating in the background even though the employer isn't using this for plan eligibility purposes? Employer doesn't want to give benefits on an extended leave of absence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flyboyjohn Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 Since you're client has not elected the look-back measurement method they are defaulted to the monthly measurement method (determine each employees' status as of the end of each calendar month). Accordingly there is no applicable stability period to worry about and the employee on extended leave of absence is not "full-time" for penalty purposes for any month in which they work less than 130 hours. elmobob14 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now