Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

We run all our DB valuations as of the beginning of the plan year. Asumming plan year is calendar, with 01/01 and 07/01 entries and 1,000 hrs required for accrual:

Q1 - should a mid-year entrant (07/01) with over 1,000 hours receive an accrual for the year?

Q2 - if not, should that mid-year entrant be included in the testing with 0% benefit?

Posted

Q1: What does the plan say? Please understand that benefit accruals are not tied to the actuarial valuation in any way.

Q2: Depending on the plan and on the reasons for the person not entering on 1/1, might the person be considered excludable for testing purposes? If not excludable, the testing would be based on the actual accrual. Again, how the person was handled for the actuarial valuation would not really matter when it comes time to perform coverage/participation/non-discrimination testing.

Always check with your actuary first!

Posted

Very common for BOY valuations to ignore those who could enter during the middle of the year.

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use