Cynchbeast Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 We run all our DB valuations as of the beginning of the plan year. Asumming plan year is calendar, with 01/01 and 07/01 entries and 1,000 hrs required for accrual: Q1 - should a mid-year entrant (07/01) with over 1,000 hours receive an accrual for the year? Q2 - if not, should that mid-year entrant be included in the testing with 0% benefit?
My 2 cents Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 Q1: What does the plan say? Please understand that benefit accruals are not tied to the actuarial valuation in any way. Q2: Depending on the plan and on the reasons for the person not entering on 1/1, might the person be considered excludable for testing purposes? If not excludable, the testing would be based on the actual accrual. Again, how the person was handled for the actuarial valuation would not really matter when it comes time to perform coverage/participation/non-discrimination testing. Always check with your actuary first!
david rigby Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 Very common for BOY valuations to ignore those who could enter during the middle of the year. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now