WhoLetTheDogsOut Posted January 13, 2016 Posted January 13, 2016 An employer has 5 employees, all of whom are officers earning over the 416 compensation requirement and none of whom are owners. Therefore, only 3 of them would be key employees due to the limit on number of officers that are treated as key employees (greater of 10% of employees or 3). Those 3 would be determined by ranking them by compensation for the determination year in question and selected the highest paid. These employees are all equal in decision making & responsibilities regarding the operation of the business. Also, all of them are highly compensated employees. They have a safe harbor 401k and are exempt from the top heavy requirements. However, if they wanted to allow after-tax employee contributions, the would lose that exemption. If any of the employees made such a contribution, it appears the two non-key employees would be required to receive a top heavy minimum. Unless my analysis is wrong, this is a crazy result that would preclude the employees from making such after-tax contributions without requiring a top heavy minimum for the two non-key employees. Anyone disagree or have any comments? Thanks.
Lou S. Posted January 13, 2016 Posted January 13, 2016 Are the SH match or SH non-elective? They could also have keys receive the TH minimum and everyone would get 3%. But yes your analysis seems correct on the after tax issue.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now