Eric Taylor Posted March 10, 2016 Posted March 10, 2016 If an employer needs / desires to limit number of participants in a newly designed disease management program providing benefits to employees diagnosed with heart disease or hypertension, could the employer: 1. Limit participation in the program to a maximum number of participants at any one time on a "first come, first served" basis such that not all similarly situated employees (i.e., employees diagnosed with hypertension or heart disease) are treated the same? 2. Impose a minimum age requirement (e.g., 50+) as a way of further concentrating the benefits of the program [or further limiting eligibility]? If there is an issue under ADEA or otherwise with excluding some otherwise eligible participants based solely on age (e.g., employees aged 40-49), could you possibly address the ADEA issue by dropping the minimum age down to 40 such that you were still favoring older employees (reverse discrimination?) but not excluding anybody 40+ protected by the ADEA? Thanks
Guest matthew222 Posted April 8, 2016 Posted April 8, 2016 on the surface this sounds problematic. i would check with a disease management vendor directly for guidance on this. one question i would have is why would the employer want to limit participation? if someone is implementing a disease management program, they believe that there's a ROI by doing so. and while i can see this figure being greater for someone who's 52 with heart disease vs. 41, i would think there's still benefit with the latter individual.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now