ETA Consulting LLC Posted August 30, 2016 Posted August 30, 2016 Just wondering if anyone has ever encountered a situation where the one-to-one QNEC correction was so excessive that the IRS has agreed to reduce the required amount under VCP.Let's suppose (for sake of argument) that a failed corrective distribution requires a one-to-one QNEC of $10 million dollars (and that would be less than the required $20 million QNEC to actually correct the ADP test. [[i used these extremes to avoid the conversations on ALL options of late corrections of ADP tests and focus squarely on VCP submissions for one-to-one]] My question is simply whether anyone has had experience with having the one-to-one reduced to a lower percentage (let's say 0.50 to 1) utilizing the argument of the excessive level of funding for a one-to-one? I ask while imagining the answer is no, but wanted to ask in the event someone may have been successful in getting this amount lowered in certain instances. Thanks :-) CPC, QPA, QKA, TGPC, ERPA
John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA Posted September 2, 2016 Posted September 2, 2016 Yes. Under a VCP application a negotiated amount was maybe a third of the usual 1-1 contribution. Some fairly extreme circumstances applied, including the employer's financial state at the time, which had to be proven with the reviewer. ETA Consulting LLC 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now