Mcomeau Posted September 21, 2016 Posted September 21, 2016 Hello What are the cost benefits of converting a Defined benefit plan to a Cash Balance Plan? What are specific issues to watch out for when doing so? Thanks
My 2 cents Posted September 21, 2016 Posted September 21, 2016 1. Under no circumstances can you do it on a wear-away basis. All benefits already accrued (including the right to possible subsidized early retirement benefits) must be protected AND accruals under the cash balance "pay credits" must be determined without regard to the existence of an accrued benefit under the prior formula. 2. Communication is critical. Want legal trouble? Try to disguise what the change will do to the rate at which future benefits will accrue. 3. Are you going to grandfather anyone with respect to the prior formula? If some people will continue on the old formula, you must worry about non-discrimination. Not numbering this, but there seems to be a mistaken idea out there that contribution levels under a cash balance plan are more stable than under a true defined contribution plan. They aren't. There is no direct link between the "pay credit" under the cash balance formula and even the Target Normal Cost for minimum funding purposes. And, of course, if the funds lose money, you have to amortize the loss (which is measured relative to the funding discount rates, not break-even) over 7 years. And pay PBGC premiums. Etc. All that, and most participants will be worse off under the cash balance approach than under the current formula. Always check with your actuary first!
SoCalActuary Posted September 21, 2016 Posted September 21, 2016 Well, you get better risk management by reducing benefit volatility, but the administration is more complex. If you are over-funded, this is a good option compared to freeze plus new plan, because you can use the surplus to fund the CB benefits. If you are not over-funded, then it is much easier to freeze, so you can manage the limited risks of that group. Then start a new and separate cash balance with its different record-keeping for the current employee group.
david rigby Posted September 21, 2016 Posted September 21, 2016 Don't forget vesting. Don't forget TH. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now