Jump to content

Incenting former employees to roll out to trim numbers


Recommended Posts

Posted

Would it be in violation of any rules to offer a gift card to former employees who still have money in the Plan incenting them to roll out so that Plan participant count drops below 100 and they can avoid an audit?

Posted

Has the employer tried charging nonemployee participants' accounts their proportionate share of the plan-administration expenses?

Peter Gulia PC

Fiduciary Guidance Counsel

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

215-732-1552

Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com

Posted

Participants pay administration fees but I think the Company pays for the 5500 audit so it's in their best interest to get below 100 employees and avoid an audit.

Posted

Any of the accounts below $1,000 (or whatever the mandatory cash-out limit in the plan)?

Also possible some of these ex-EEs have forgotten about it? Perhaps a friendly reminder letter?

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Posted

This would be balance over $5,000 that they want out of the Plan to get their numbers down. It appears that they've been offered a $250 gift card incentive to move out of the Plan.

Posted

Has the employer considered charging nonemployee participants' accounts their proportionate share of all plan-administration expenses, including the fees and expenses of the independent qualified public accountant?

Peter Gulia PC

Fiduciary Guidance Counsel

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

215-732-1552

Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com

Posted

Has the employer considered charging nonemployee participants' accounts their proportionate share of all plan-administration expenses, including the fees and expenses of the independent qualified public accountant?

[semi-satirical comment] Would the selection of the independent qualified public accountant then be a fiduciary action, subject to litigation if the fees were higher than those of some other accountants?

Always check with your actuary first!

Posted

Gift cards are all from one company/store.

...which may have limited "incentive" if significant number of participants don't, or cannot, access that store.

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Posted

About the time they receive their account statements, send a reminder letter of how much in plan administration fees they're paying by not rolling out. Not paying administration fees is a gift card that keeps giving.

Posted

I can't think of anything wrong with that kind of incentive, but I'm not commenting on that. If employer is so concerned about this, consider splitting the plan into two plans, each of which will have well under 100 participants. I know the DOL has made some noises about this possibly not working, but there is no legal basis for that position.

Posted

The root of the question is whether or not this would be some sort of prohibited transaction or run afoul of any distribution rules.

Posted

An administrator's selection of an independent qualified public accountant is a fiduciary decision (even when the plan does not pay the IQPA's fee).

If all or some of the IQPA's fee will be charged against participants' accounts, an administrator should consider the relation of the IQPA's services and fee to incur no more than a prudent expense.

Peter Gulia PC

Fiduciary Guidance Counsel

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

215-732-1552

Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use