Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Prohibition?  No.  What kind of amending are you thinking about?  If the change somehow potentially impacts the time and/or form of payment, you may be required to follow the 1 year/5 year rule.

 - There are two types of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data sets...

Posted

Generally, 409A only prohibits or inhibits you from changing payment dates, but your question is way to general to really know what you have in mind.

Luke Bailey

Senior Counsel

Clark Hill PLC

214-651-4572 (O) | LBailey@clarkhill.com

2600 Dallas Parkway Suite 600

Frisco, TX 75034

Posted

Agree no 409A issues generally, but could be ERISA issues despite being top hat. See Plotnick v CSC, 458 F.3d (4th Cir Ct App. Nov. 2017) for a very recent case on this very issue- right of sponsor to change the crediting rate.  High level answer from the case- proper process and nondiscrimination (fairness) in the change between participants.  This case held the participants did not make their case so the opinion of the App. Ct. is a good one for practical guidance on elements to avoid problems.

Posted

The benefit is determined by a formula like a DB Plan. The proposed amendment would change the date on which the benefit is determined (e.g. as of 12/31/17 instead of 12/31/18).  Essentially freezing the benefit.

It would not affect the timing or form of the distribution.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use