Guest MFuentes Posted July 13, 2000 Posted July 13, 2000 A company sponsors a money purchase pension plan that, once eligibility has been met and a participant begins participation, requires 501 hours of service to receive an allocation of the contribution for the plan year. The company has decided, near the end of the plan year, that they don't want to make contributions to employees who terminated during the year so they amend their plan to require employement on the last day requirement as a requirement to receive a contribution allocation. Some of the terminees worked the 501 hours and when they left were expecting a contribution. Now they won't get one. Is this a cut-back of benefits?
KJohnson Posted July 13, 2000 Posted July 13, 2000 Based on the facts you set forth it is a cutback. You may want to look at the following http://www.reish.com/practice_areas/Techni...lTips/tip16.cfm [Edited by KJohnson on 07-14-2000 at 09:21 AM]
Kirk Maldonado Posted July 14, 2000 Posted July 14, 2000 My recollection is that the Section 411(d)(6)regulations would require that persons who have already completed 501 hours get an allocation. Kirk Maldonado
Dawn Hafner Posted July 14, 2000 Posted July 14, 2000 I agree. Those employees that worked 501 hours already did what they had to to get the contribution. This can not be taken from them once earned. DMH
actuarysmith Posted July 17, 2000 Posted July 17, 2000 411(d)(6) would preclude amending the plan for the current year. The terminated employees had already satisfied the terms and conditions for benefit accrual and are entitled to a contribution for the current. The plan could be amended, but would only apply to future plan years.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now