Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

As a former legislative staffer (state level), my instinct is always to look for the subterranean motives behind proposal of such legislation.

This looks like a Democrats-only initiative, which means Harkin has no aspirations for its passage. That should mean he wants something from DOL which, as Kirk suggests, is ostensibly the outfit that should be advocating for participants' interests.

My hunch is Harkin's constituency doesn't line up well with DOL's; he gains nothing from extending its domain, & loses nothing by proposing creation of a 'competing' entity--and may gain indirectly from it. How? Since he sits on a body that oversees DOL, DOL may find it valuable to horse-trade with him concerning this issue ("we have a bill that may accomplish some/all of your goals; How might we persuade you to table your own initiative?")

I confess I haven't read the bill in detail, and my conjectures are totally academic. Still, my bottom line is that this dog barks, but won't hunt.

An aside: Senator Harkin's website is...what it is. Can anyone find his Committee assignments mentioned anywhere there?

Posted

Interesting comments by Greg.

But Senator Harkin's committee assignments can be found at his website by clicking on "Legislation".

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use