Guest AlCal Posted July 20, 2000 Posted July 20, 2000 If benefit at NRA is a flat % of compensation(i.e. 100%) are we oblige to reduce it by at least 1/25 for each year of service less than 25? Thanks
Lorraine Dorsa Posted July 21, 2000 Posted July 21, 2000 If you are referring to the safe harbor requirements of IRC 1.401(a)(4) with regard to the amounts of benefits, there is a safe harbor for flat benefit formulas which requires the 25 year reduction you mention. However, a qualified DB plan can use any formula which will satisfy the non-discrimination rules. You can use the flat benefit formula without reduction, but you will have to use either the non-design based safe harbor which requires limited testing or the general test which requires full testing.
david rigby Posted July 21, 2000 Posted July 21, 2000 Also, if you are trying to create a benefit of 100% of comp, refer to IRC 415(B)(3) for the defintion of comp, and refer to IRC 414(B)(5)(B) for the "phase-in", that is, the 100% applies where the employee has at least 10 years of service. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Guest AlCal Posted July 21, 2000 Posted July 21, 2000 Thanks for the input. More specifically; for a one person Standardized Prototype DB (no other participants)should I ever worry about this benefit limitation?
Gary Posted July 24, 2000 Posted July 24, 2000 In your case it appears that the 25 year issue is not relevant. The only apparent and certain concern is 415.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now